SCI论文（www.lunwensci.com）
许多学者认为他们的论文在主题选择或中心结构方面是完美的，但为什么他们往往不受青睐呢？语言的作用是清楚地表达意义，书面语言是一样的，所有的词都是为了表达意义。由于SCI论文是英语论文，不可避免地会遇到词不达意的期刊，当遇到这种情况时，如何处理？
A.如何指出当前研究的不足并有目的地引导出自己研究的重要性?
在叙述前人成果之后，用However来引导不足，提出一种新方法或新方向。如：However, little information (little attention / little work / little data / ittle research……) (or few studies / few investigations / few researchers / few attempts……) (or no / none of these studies……) has (have) been done on (focused on / attempted to / conducted / investigated / studied (with respect to).
研究方法和方向与前人一样时，可通过以下方式强调自己工作：However, data is still scarce (rare, less accurate) or there is still dearth of……We need to (aim to, have to) provide more documents (data, records, studies, increase the dataset). Further studies are still necessary (essential)……
2.Discussion
A.怎样提出观点：在提出自己的观点时，采取什么样的策略很重要，不合适的句子通常会遭到reviewer置疑。
(1)如果观点不是这篇论文最新提出的，通常要用We confirm that……
(2)对于自己很自信的观点，可用We believe that……
(3)通常，由数据推断出一定的结论，用Results indicate, infer, suggest, imply that……
(4)在极其特别时才可用We put forward(discover, observe)……"for the first time"来强调自己的创新……
(5)如果自己对所提出的观点不完全肯定，可用We tentatively put forward (interrprete this to…)Or The results may be due to (caused by) attributed to resulted from……Or This is probably a consequence of……It seems that……can account for (interpret) this……Or It is posible that it stem from……要注意这些结构要合理搭配。
如果通篇是类型1)和5)，那这篇论文的意义就大打折扣。如果全是2)，肯定会遭到置疑。所以要仔细分析自己成果的创新性以及可信度。
文章出自SCI论文网转载请注明出处：https://www.lunwensci.com/scizixun/38902.html
